remarkably unfocused

Thursday, March 31, 2005

What Brings You Here

I always look forward to checking out my site stats to see the search strings that have led people here. This info never fails to amuse. Here are the top searches for March:

top searches for March '05

Remarkably unfocused, indeed. Todd? I think you might have a stalker. And David Mamet? How did a search for David Mamet lead someone here? Three times, no less. Must have been MSN Search.

Speaking of Microsoft...

Isn't it a weebit funny that MSN's new front page is as sparse as it is? Microsoft would never have copied Google's practical design in this way if Google hadn't destroyed them in the race to create the best search algorithms. Now they're forced to copy them in obvious ways. Is there any company as large as Microsoft with as little imagination today? Microsoft hasn't done anything interesting in so long you have to wonder what the hell they're doing over there.

Buy Buy Buy!

Looking at my usage stats, I wish my stock holdings had experienced a March spike like this. Still pretty modest numbers overall, but as long as the trend is upwards, things are good.

March spike

Spam Filter Anthology III

Had a look inside Ye Olde Spam Filtere today. Not as much spam as usual, which is progress. Here's the best of the lot, unedited as usual:

  • You are nominated for a Ph.D.
  • the cock-crow was repeated
  • We determine to tender you utterly new model of Breitling watches.
  • Like being 18 again (without the zits)
  • Protect yourself from spam
  • Your Xanax refill is ready
  • Rolex for $249.99
  • No dogs! Only best
  • Do you want a green card?
  • You have been selected
  • Lucien, check this out
  • Re:
  • Can carla come over today?
  • The universe is a figment of its own imagination. There's no future in time travel.
  • Shaggy distributor
  • Where did Lorrie go
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

Monday, March 28, 2005

Pull up a chair, let's talk national sales tax

Taxes. The advent of another belated spring just has to have its annoying balancing act, tax time. It can't just bring crisp 55 degree air and early blooms and open car windows and thoughts of golf, can it? Noooo, it has to tug taxes along for the ride. Annual party pooperage. Pfft.

Now that the lead-in requirement has been satisfied, I want to talk about this national sales tax concept. The complete lifting of the income tax in favor of a consumption tax could be revolutionary for this country. You can't really say with anything resembling certainty what would happen under a tax concept such as this, at least not until it starts happening.

No matter how refined your economics acumen, there's a reason that most economic concepts have equally brilliant people on both sides of the Pros and Cons, arguing convincingly about why a consumption tax would be disastrous or universally beneficial and ultimately the fairest system. I just want to hear the ideas. It's damn interesting, that's for sure. Tax my car purchase (more). Tax my television. Tax that new set of golf clubs. Just don't tax me, cuz that would be, you know, taxing. It'll never pass, at least not soon. A natural incentive for everyone to save more, or an open invitation to a whole new brand of frugality bordering on cheapness? All predictions aside, I think both sides, and even those on the fence, would agree that there are three inevitabilities. Positive inevitabilities:

  • We'd save eight gazookazillion dollars in IRS documentation and bloat.
  • It would cut off a major vein that has fed corruption and evasion, which the US estimates costs the tax roll about 5 or 6 gamookabillion dollars every year.
  • We wouldn't have these annoying piles of paper on our desks every damn March.

I don't know, but it's interesting. And one other thing is for sure: the tax attorney lobby will spend nine kamikaquillion dollars lobbying against it. And that's serious money. That's nearly three yodabucks.

Seriously though...I'd like to talk about this. Do you like what this would mean for you, do you think it's a fair spreading of the tax burden, and what do you think it would mean for the country over, say, a ten year span? I want opinions, baby. Supporting facts are a nice plus but not essential. Just imagine we're at a bar and you're inhaling the nut/chex mix as you 'splain your take on it.

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

Bored of that? Wanna see some interesting but slightly creepy art? Check out this guy's "age maps". He takes a photo of a person as a child and merges it ripped-photo style with that person's adult face. Here's a sample of the photographer himself:

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

This test should be a cinch for some, impossible for others. If you love Monty Python, this is as easy as the bridgekeeper's three questions. If you don't love Python, you'll have better luck with an all-essay exam on string theory.

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

Labels:

Saturday, March 26, 2005

Thoughts on another saturday morning

The guy behind Save Toby is brilliant. Hilarious way to supplement your income. Have a look.

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

So Castro is pissed off about being listed among Forbes' richest. This is precisely the kind of response one would expect from a complete fraud.

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

This is a week old, but hey. This 'aint a news source. This article about how the City of Buffalo's municipal office building didn't have the funds to purchase toilet paper should say all there is to say about the problems in that city. If a city ever needed to clean house, find the balls to rid themselves of decades-long corruption, and put some long-overdue tax incentives for new business, well...the conclusion is obvious.

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

I've about had enough of the media's over coverage of the Terri Schiavo case. I don't think it's much different than the summer of the shark back in 2001, when the media couldn't talk about anything else and tried to sell the world on the idea that sharks are becoming more aggressive, which is absurd. I'm going to say what I haven't heard anyone else say: I have no opinion on the Terri Schiavo case. There's a glut of opinion on this already. Unfortunately, there are and have been and will be many Terri Schiavos, and if the federal courts were not involved, this would be a local interest story at most. With all due condolences to the woman's family and friends, can we talk about something else? Enough already.

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

This morning I was swept into a movie that I hadn't seen in years n' years, possibly as far back as high school. I liked in then and I love it now. I couldn't get away from it. It's called Never Cry Wolf. It was released in 1983 and chronicles the true story of a biologist studying the wolves of the Arctic Circle. The cinematography is stunning, the Inuit non-actors do an unbelievable job and force you to love them, and the story is engrossing in a uniquely quiet way. It unfolds like a two-hour poem, and you'll come away from it with a warm feeling in your gut. We can all use a film like this one every now and then. It's cleansing somehow. Anyway, the movie ends with an old Inuit poem that reaches me like few poems ever have. Maybe it will reach you, too:

I think over again my small adventures
My fears
Those small ones that seemed so big
For all the vital things I had to get and to reach.
And yet there is only one great thing.
The only thing.
To live to see the great day that dawns
And the light that fills the world.

Labels:

Thursday, March 24, 2005

So I was thinking...

You know when you have those moments when you're reading something or watching something on teevee or just lost in your own head, and all of a sudden in a flash of insight you make about a hundred connections at once and at that moment you can rattle them all off in a bizarre soliloquy but you don't at first because you're alone and in modern times soliloquies are considered lunatic ravings but you do it anyway because it's just you and the dog and somewhere in the middle you wish you could find your voice recorder because you know you won't be able to do it twice...well...that happened to me this morning. Shit.

* * * * * * * * *

Nik and I just can't enjoy the same television. She records her "Days" and "General", which she justifies as harmless but addictive comedies disguised as dramas, as well the usual smattering of "reality" television (I've gone to great lengths to explain that "reality television" is the misnomer of the 21st century, but it just slides off of her...) and her "critical choices", which include 24 and The Apprentice, which are supposed to give some weight to her overall menu. Well, I still haven't seen 24 but I hear it's pretty good, and The Apprentice...entertaining but not compelling. I'm never driven to sit down and see another episode. If I happen to be there, I might get sucked in. That sorta show. Donald has great hair and I think he's pretty funny, even if it's not intentional.

Anyway, I succeeded in addicting her on Northern Exposure reruns that I record from the 2:00 a.m. slot on the Hallmark channel, but she has seen nearly every episode now, and I fear that we have nothing left to share in the entertainment world. As I write this, she's downstairs watching what I don't care to watch and I'm up here typing this very sentence. And she's begging me to come downstairs and "give it a chance" but I know she just wants me to keep her feet warm.

On top of all this, we're fighting for storage space on our DVR. With all the Gar-bahj she records, many of my recordings are cut off. I get to see half of a great Myth Busters or ten minutes of Modern Marvels before it cuts off. We either need a bigger DVR drive, or one of us needs to surrender. I won't surrender.

* * * * * * * * *

For YEARS I've been told that I need to listen to Modest Mouse. I was told that I would absolutely love them.

You haven't heard Modest Mouse? Ever?

No, but I...

OMFG, man. Go now! hit Itunes now! You have to know Modest Mouse. I know you'll love 'em.

...kay...

I just listened to some snippets and I can already tell it's true. I'm several years late to this party. Mouse, meet my thirteen dollars.

* * * * * * * * *

Todd just alerted me to this stunning headline: Researchers Recover T. Rex Tissue. WOW. Jurassic Park comes to life. If they can extract any viable DNA from this specimen...WOW...maybe, just maybe, we'll have a chance to learn a lot more about them someday relatively soon. It also made me wonder how the Flat Earth society would respond to this find. "Oh that? That? That's just the work of Satan's Soft Tissue Misinformation campaign, which is led by the Department of Underwordly Affairs and financed by the Lucifer Trust. You can believe it's real at your own peril."

* * * * * * * * *

Stories like these are supposed to be urban legends. Nobody really finds a finger in their chili. Well, I guess they do. I figure it's 3:1 odds that the mob is involved, 2:1 odds that an unreported industrial accident did NOT result in the proper paperwork and recall.

Labels:

Monday, March 21, 2005

Stallone Good, Lucas...Not So Good?

The other day I flipped on sports radio to keep me company as I work. I usually listen to a Web broadcast of ESPN Radio, occasionally NPR, and once in a while, when the topic is golf or football, I listen to Jim Rome. I can only take him in small bits, because there's something about his voice that grates me. But I understand he's a good guy, and he's often pretty funny if you can get past his not-so-tough-guy-trying-like-hell-to-sound-like-a-tough-guy voice. Anyway, enough disclaimers. But more on tough-guy voices...

Rome's guest was Sylvester Stallone, there to pitch his new show called The Contender, which is, not surprisingly, about amateur boxers. Not being "in to" boxing, I figured I'd change it to NPR or whatever else sounded good. I got up to change the station, but just before I pressed another preset, I heard Stallone use the word amalgamate in perfect context. The word sounded strange coming from that voice, that Yo, Adrian voice. But there it was, perfectly executed off the cuff. I paused, backed away from the radio, and sat back down to work. In a few minutes, he managed to use awry, beholden, and pericardial without missing a beat. By the time he tossed out neophyte, I realized that for years I had been fooled by the Stallone Stereotype. You can tell from listening to this guy that's he's sharp. Not "sharp for Stallone", but just a sharp guy. And not just because of the words he used, I mean, big deal. It was his messages, his quickness. I was entertained and impressed. I'd like to have a beer with Sylvester Stallone. He's a neat guy.


Come get some...antidisestablishmentarianism!

So yea. Maybe my (former) impression of him is similar to yours. It was born of his typecasted persona and years of comedians poking fun at his vacuous jock voice, that unmistakable Rocky sound that suggests a lack of sophistication and awareness. You know what I mean...it's like, Jesse Ventura reading Kierkegaard probably wouldn't work. But Stallone apparently never gave a damn about the false impression that his Hollywood characters have left on us. I feel like I'm condescending by merely saying that I was surprised by his interview. Sorry, Sly. None of that intended. Beer? On me.

* * * * * * * * *

I'm a Star Wars kid. In the late 70s to early 80s, I had all the action figures, a tie fighter, a millennium falcon, and an X-wing. Star Wars was the coolest thing ever. But the first taste of disappointment came with the final episode, Return of the Jedi, which introduced a chatty species of teddy bears who, equipped like stone aged hunters, play as much role in the saving of the universe as the leading heroes. No kid worth knowing ever owned an Ewok action figure. They sucked, and even kids knew it.

So years later the "prequels" arrived and former Star Wars kids like me couldn't wait to see the saga continue. But Jar Jar Binks happened, and a collective sigh was heard 'round the world. Episodes I and II had their share of neat-O moments, but they were overshadowed by the dreadful dialogue and piss poor direction. It was so bad in spots that you could see actors like Liam Neeson and Ewan McGregor wincing under their game faces. Yep, George Lucas disappointed us grown ups, us former kids sucked into his world. Teaser trailers for both prequels looked good, if not great. They made ye mouth water for more saga. And both movies stank in their own way. I made a mental note to not expect much for Episode III. Don't be fooled by another cleverly assembled trailer.

I just watched the latest trailer for Episode III, and Oh, *MAN*...This One Will Be Different.

Sunday, March 20, 2005

Thingy 2.0

Well, this is it. What I figured would take me a weekend has taken me four weekends and several late weekday nights. I thought, eh, this'll be a quick job. OMFG what a pain in my ass. I hadn't take into account that:

  1. The Blogger system is limited.
  2. There are only so many things you can do with it, no matter how hard you try. Contemplating a switch to Movable Type, but I don't feel ready for another pain in my ass. Not just yet.
  3. If you want to do anything remotely cool with your CSS layout, you STILL have to hunt down hacks for at LEAST the four major browsers (IE/Win and Mac, Safari, and Mozilla).
  4. After all, you want to make sure that Mary Smithsonfrenson in Utah or Larry Rosenrosen in Pensacola doesn't see your site as a jigsaw puzzle in IE 5.5/Win ME or whatever. Thanks, Mary. Thanks Larry. You owe me twelve hours each.
  5. It has been a while since I've had my hands on code.
  6. It all came back quickly, but it's funny when you have to go up to the attic to find a book on CSS that you wrote so you can remember how background-position coordinates are handled. ("Oooh yyyeeaaa, that's right...")
  7. I never, ever like the first few iterations of a design.
  8. It took a Thoreau reminder for me to finally simplify, simplify.
  9. Solving browser compatibility problems is a sure-fire way to experience missing time.
  10. While looking for the latest CSS2 and CSS3 selector hacks to nudge things around only in Opera 7 or only in Win IE 6 but not IE 5.5 or only in IE/Mac and Safari and Mozilla/Win but not Mozilla/Mac and certainly not Opera 6 and earlier but definitely in Opera 7...etc., It suddenly occurred to me that it was dawn, and I hadn't gone to bed yet. There goes half of Saturday. Hunting down rogue semicolons is not my idea of time well spent, either.

This might be of interest to nobody but me, but I think I stumbled on a solution to a well-known limitation/irksome problem in CSS float-based layouts. I'd describe it and create a figure, but I doubt you care. But write me if you do and I'll 'splain.

Anyway, this new thingy environment is going to continue to evolve, but in this general format. I added the style switchers to (hopefully) accommodate any color and reading preferences. I'll put up additional swatches and a text size switcher soon. The color scheme you choose will be persistent for later visits, on a per-browser basis.

Oh, and if your mug happens to land up there in the random image rotator, don't blame me. It's random.

* * * * * * * * *

Wednesday, March 16, 2005

Whatchamacallthis

There aren't many warm fuzzies available on the evening news, but I got a few yesterday upon seeing that BB King, Buddy Guy, The Pretenders, and of course, U2, were inducted into the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame. Talk about deserving. And BTW, for a variety of good reasons, I don't consider the RRHOF ceremony to be tantamount to an awards show.

* * * * * * * * *

If you have ten minutes to spare, take this entertaining test of your senses. (It doesn't really test your taste and smell, but your intellectual assumptions re: those senses.) I usually don't think much of these, but this one is interesting. Beat my score of 16 and I'll cook ya some grits. (Anyone remember Flo from Alice?... anyone...? ...Nevermind.)

* * * * * * * * *

This past Monday, the folks around Seattle had a rare day, cosmically speaking.

* * * * * * * * *

Sigh...another sad case of

     mental instability 
   + religious fanaticism 
   = body bags. 

* * * * * * * * *

Turning away from that, maximize that browser window and check out this grand shot of the Earth. Don't know 'boutchoo, but I could look at it for about the duration of a cup o' coffee. Sip sip. Ponder. Sip.

* * * * * * * * *

This one might appeal only to the guys (just a guess), but I really got hooked on this game the other night. Using the set of fans, blocks and conveyors they provide, find a way to move the item to the exit. Yea, it's one of those, but it's addicting as hell. Stay away if you have a lot of work to do. Otherwise, enjoy.

* * * * * * * * *

So, a Catholic cardinal is getting his rage on about The DaVinci Code. Gotta love these Catholic church leaders. These guys in their red robes and gold telling the world what Truth is all about. They'd like the world to forget that the Bible is a collection of accounts, assembled into the Bible canon by men. Many stories were omitted to suit the dogmas of the church at (that) time, and now these stories are collectively (and cleverly) called the apocrypha. Yet there's nothing that gives the "apocryphal" Gospel of Thomas, for example, any less credibility than Matthew's tale. Others were edited, then edited again, and again, and again throughout history, to suit the liking of the church. And he's talking about lies? There are no lies in these matters, because there are no truths. There are only beliefs. We don't know what really happened two thousand years ago.

Anything that remotely threatens to upset the assumptions they've been sitting on for centuries upon centuries is going to take some papal heat. If a four-story angelic apparition appeared before every person on Earth simulataneously (somehow), and spoke in a voice heard by everyone (somehow), and told us that all of humanity's religious assumptions are wrong or based on misunderstandings and misinterpretations through time, the Catholic church would just pull out the devil card.

It's called literature, Mister Cardinal. They're called ideas.

* * * * * * * * *

Monday, March 14, 2005

ESPN's TILT: I Want to hate it

Poker is everywhere. ESPN endlessly re-runs The World Series of Poker, the Travel Channel shows more of the World Poker Tour than it does all European destinations combined, and Bravo has a big hit in Celebrity Poker Showdown, which gives viewers the rare opportunity so see how truly unimpressive some celebrities are in the raw.

I’d never have believed that poker could make for compelling television, but it's clearly getting its hooks into a wide audience. Maybe it's that we get to see everyone’s hand as they play it, allowing us to watch the game unfold in a God-state in which we know for sure what choices to make while the world’s best players do not. The piles of cash dropped onto the winners' laps doesn't hurt, either. Seeing real cash presented to real people is usually enough to keep viewers glued to the last few minutes of a broadcast. Anyway, the old game is back and it’s bigger than ever.

So it was no surprise when the folks at ESPN, having helped fashion the wheels on this bandwagon, announced the production of a new dramatic series about career Vegas grifters and the people who hate them. "TILT" is ESPN’s second attempt at an original drama, and while it will probably outlive Playmakers, last year's stilted attempt to depict life in the NFL, it will do so not necessarily out of relative merit but because TILT doesn’t have a multi-billion dollar organization spanking it on the fanny for its negative depiction of the league. TILT has many of the same problems that Playmakers had, and a few more of its own.

Like it’s predecessor, TILT has a cast of unlikable, marginally interesting characters. The show pits three young, talented poker players against a cabal of established cheaters. We’re supposed to be rooting for the young trio of Eddie (Eddie Cibrian), Miami (Kristin Lehman), and Clark (Todd Williams), so ESPN made sure they were gorgeous. They’re 30-ish, stylish, and sexy, cut right from the Hollywood mold. All you have to do is watch twenty minutes of the World Poker Tour to see that this depiction of life in the Vegas poker rooms is way off the mark. If ESPN wanted to draw a realistic picture, the cast would consist of forgotten physiques, over-50 lifers in Members Only jackets, and frumpy Asian math wizards.

With a few satisfying exceptions, the acting lacks subtlety. You might expect casino dialogue to be dull and riddled with clichés, so it’s easy to forgive some of the goofy exchanges, but TILT’s most visible problem is its unrelenting reliance on Tough Guy Posturing, or TGP. Playmakers had it in abundance, too. It's an affliction that strikes writers and directors when they think that what they're doing is a bigger deal than it really is. Or better than it really is. If Quentin Tarantino’s recent films bore you, you know what I’m talking about. TGP is delivered by the characters in a story but it's fueled by the egos of a show's creative team.

Don "The Matador" Everest is the seedy antagonist of the series (played expertly by Michael Madsen), and every time he speaks in his smoky, scratchy voice, he lays on the TGP so thick you'll swear you can see the writers sitting at a boardroom table scribbling decent material and calling it genius. Or worse, calling it important. The characters of TILT are in desperate need of some depth and contradiction. They’re all cartoons of themselves.

There’s a scene in which Eddie and Don’s Everest’s daughter Dee, a twiggy model who can’t be a day over 23, are dressing themselves after sex consummated within 24 hours of their introduction. Don appears at Eddie’s door to invite him to a big game and he sees that his daughter is there. He sniffs the air, and in his card room voice, says to his daughter, "Well, I certainly hope there’s enough of him left over. I’m going to need him." It’s an awkward, alien moment. It's also the kind of hook that makes otherwise disinterested viewers keep watching.

TILT’s plot unfolds gradually, and through five episodes we know that in one way or another, the Matador had betrayed or cheated every important character (and a few marginal characters to boot) at some point in their lives. If there’s a moral buried somewhere in TILT, I hope it’s not "You can cross people and benefit, but be mindful not to cross too many." They’re all bent on exacting their own personal revenge, and as they inch closer, the tension builds like a gathering storm. Or, at least that’s how we’re supposed to feel.

TILT offers a bit of game savvy, and you’ll hear a few good ol' poker aphorisms, but there’s an overwhelming sense of fiction in this fiction. It’s easy to dislike TILT if you decide you’re going to dislike it, as I did, but you’ll likely find that it becomes more entertaining the more you watch. You might find yourself sneering at the screen, yet watching with interest. But maybe I’m just another sucker. You won’t care about a single soul on the screen, but it’s not hard to be taken by the notion of cosmic justice right around the corner.

But still, fictionalized card play? I think ESPN should stick to what it does best - sports news, scores, highlights, and analysis. They're great at that. The best. (The only.) What makes shows like Celebrity Poker Showdown and the World Poker Tour fun to watch for many is that they present real people with real hands and real quandaries. TILT has none of that. Poker is a great game with a storied past and apparently a booming future, but I’m betting that while millions will learn to enjoy the game, they won’t give a damn about "the life".

* * * * * * * * *

Thursday, March 10, 2005

SF State U: Idiocy disguised as activism

Aaarrrrrgh.

Today, at San Francisco State University, a mob of student "activists", who will heretofore be collectively referred to as idiots or the idiots, assembled in the student center on campus, with their silly placards and bumper sticker platitudes and mindless chanting and patchoulli stank. They came to protest a participant at their annual campus job fair.

They came to protest the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Air Force. They came with the goal of "permanently banning military recruiters from all school levels," under the guise of free speech. Anyone see a problem here? The idiots don't. The University invited them, military recruiters have attended college career fairs for the last, oh, zillion years, and signing up is voluntary. Voluntary, people. That means they're not going to hold an AK-47 to your head, tell you to drop and give them twenty, kill a puppy, and sign your life away. There was nothing to protest. If this is what "making a difference" means to these people, they might as well just dial in the rest of their lives.
Idiots...

Yet there they stood, screaming, in front of a booth hosted by two recruiters of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (!) and another by the U.S. Air Force. As if joining the Army Corp of Engineers is a baaaad thing. Idiots. They have NO IDEA what the Army Corp of Engineers does. The idiots are ignorant of all that the Army Corp of Engineers has done for this country, foreign countries, third world countries, and organizations like the Nature Conservancy and our own national parks, to name a few beneficiaries. They don't know that the Army Corp of Engineers solves civil engineering problems all over the globe, for a variety of interests. They don't know that they've done more for the people of this planet than Greenpeace. They don't know that they spend most of their efforts on disaster relief and humanitarian projects. They don't know and they don't care to know. Anything associated with the military is, like, baaad. The military is an "issue" that must be "solved".
Idiots...

"Our goal is to kick recruiters off campus permanently and to raise awareness about the issue."

I wish I had been there to interview some of these people. I'd ask, "Why are you protesting the recruitment of engineers into one of the best civil engineering organizations on the planet? Do you even know what they do?" I'd expect a response such as "They're babykillers, those assholes! They just want to brainwash our students so we can fight wars for oil and kill for Bush! Woooooo! No More! NO WAR! No More! NO WAR!" And of course, by volume alone I wouldn't be able to get a word in edgewise. There would be suspicion of me just for having asked.
Idiots...

I like the quote of one of the lead idiots, Kristen Anderson: "Our goal is to kick recruiters off campus permanently and to raise awareness about the issue." What issue Kristen? Do you mean military recruiting on your left-of-left campus? They've been recruiting on your campus long before you arrived to grace the Earth. It's that, isn't it? Under the guise of free speech and assembly, you want to permanently revoke the rights of an organization—an organization that might very well have enabled your existence—to assemble and aquire volunteers interested in a military career. Well, Kristen, you're a great spokesperson for the loud and intellectually impaired. You're too stupid to realize that you're an idiot. You're too uninformed to form an informed opinion. You're too lazy to self-examine. Your blinders make it impossible for you to see how baseless and useless your words and efforts are.
Idiots...

People like these protesters are precisely what has destroyed the Democratic party. They unwittingly helped to elect the man they hate so much. Sensible folk will give people like this a wide berth. They have morphed the Democratic party from a platform of ideas and honest debate into a shouting, riotous mass that's anti-x and anti-y. Good luck finding out what they're for these days. Like most people, I was a self-described liberal coming out of college. But even then I wouldn't have taken part in something as fatuous as this. It's tantamount to protesting the Peace Corp because they use the word "Corp". It's THAT stupid.
Idiots...

Idiots...

I'm certain that at least a few of these protesters had a parent who took the military route out of college. Certainly their grandfathers did. Or their great-grandfathers. Surely at least one of these stupid kids had an elder family member who was in the Air Force. But they're not thinking about their parents or their grandparents or why freedom even exists in the United States. They're thinking only of themselves. That's all this protest was about. It's about them. They think they stand for something but they don't. They think *they* are the "smart ones", which would be laughable if it wasn't so sad. This was less a protest and more a stage for them to define themselves by what they're against, rather than what they're for. Be wary of anyone who is comfortable being defined by what they're against.
Idiots...

Meanwhile, the recruiters, bewildered, sat patiently and politely while the idiots got in their face and screamed their vacuous clichés. They remained respectful of their right to assemble and protest, if not their message (whatever it was). The scene scared away all the other recruiters...corporate recruiters that might have been able to offer them exciting new careers in their chosen fields.
Idiots. Insufferable, mindless idiots...

Labels:

Monday, March 07, 2005

Oh wait. Nine more

I'd like to start this with a favorite picture of mine, mentioned a few thingies ago. It's just too good to leave buried in a post.

That's better. Nowthen...

* * * * * * * * *

I own an iPod. I like it a lot. Love, even. But I couldn't ever ascend (or is it descend?) to this level of iPod geekdom. Neat design and all, but...jeez, people.

* * * * * * * * *

Okay. You've seen Office Space, correct? If not, then you need to see Office Space. If you have, you'll get a kick out of this short film. Ah...Yyyeeaa, ah, if you could go ahead and do that, it would be great, yyeea. Thanks!

* * * * * * * * *

This could very well be the new definition of excessive force.

* * * * * * * * *

Take 30 seconds to read this and tell me if you think it's bullshit. How can it not be bullshit to say that regularly eating tortilla chips suggests that you're a perfectionist while habitually snacking on potato chips means you're aggressive...? They're actually giving away grants and doctorate degrees for these kinds of studies. Hey Dr. Hirsch: I'm not impressed.

* * * * * * * * *

The other day I brought up the Dukes of Hazzard. Turns out you can pull $100,000 just by watching old re-runs of the show. Imagine that. A new category of six-figure jobs.

* * * * * * * * *

I just love headlines like this.

* * * * * * * * *

But maybe not as much as headlines like this: Mysterious object in space could be new "burper" object. This could start an exciting new trend of cosmic toilet nomenclature. Interesting things, these burpers.

* * * * * * * * *

Speaking of toilets, leave it to the crafty Japanese to come up with a hands-free throne...meet the Toto Neorest 600, courtesy of Bob Vila. Yes, it does everything. (The pause in the middle of the video is just a brief commercial.)

* * * * * * * * *

Friday, March 04, 2005

Four quickies

Just when I thought I was close to settling on a new design, I thought of too many reasons why I don't like it. In the latest rejected design comp, my idea was to sort of shift the current thingy to the top, to make it the focus rather than thingy itself. I figured that wrapping the text around the new circular doodad would be a nifty design signature. Then I realized that, to me (and possibly you), it will eventually feel like that fabled pea at the bottom of the mattress. And not having a "site ID" at the top is probably not a great idea, however quasi-novel it might have seemed for an hour. Alas, back to the drawing board. Any thoughts?

* * * * * * * * *

The cat world has a new superhero. What a trooper.

* * * * * * * * *

The following site only looks political. It's really not, so whatever your leanings are, you should be entertained. He pokes fun through music. Hilarious music. This guy is talented, and he has a lot of time on his hands. Without further ado, I bring you the party party. ALERT: This is not work-friendly stuff, and it's pretty crass in spots. But you WILL laugh.

* * * * * * * * *

If that didn't get you, take 15 minutes while you're eating that sandwich and browse through the gallery of bad album covers. You WILL be cleaning your monitor afterwards. Some of these are gut-holding funny.


Just a sample
* * * * * * * * *

Tuesday, March 01, 2005

On the Dukes of Hazzard

Flipping through the channels in a half-awake haze last night, I stopped on The Dukes of Hazzard. Caught the last 15 minutes of an episode that I'll guess originally aired in 1980. I couldn't take my eyes off it. I don't know how many years it had been since I'd seen an episode of the Dukes. Many.

Isn't it strange when you see something like this for the first time in a long, long time...? That flood of memories and associations. Old friends come to mind, whose names I haven't thought of in twenty years. I recalled a kid named John Tehan, whose family moved in to the D'Antonio's house in the eleven o'clock position on our cul-de-sac. Yea. John and I loved watching the Dukes. And eating graham crackers. His mother would only allow us to eat graham crackers and milk. That's it. Ever. John moved to England in 82. Think it was 82. Doesn't matter.

I'll guess this episode was called "The Legend of Daisy's Song", going by the ever-present narration throughout the Dukes stories. When I first landed on this channel (CMT, whatever that stands for) the Dukes were being chased (of course) but they weren't in the General Lee. They were driving some yellow muscle car with a big black stripe. I vaguely remember this car as being "pre General Lee", but I was probably twelve the last time a Dukes concept occupied my mind, so I don't trust that memory.

Anyway, I was struck by the strangeness of the action. Rosco P. Coltrane and his likable simpleton sidekick Enos pull over the Duke boys. This happened in Every. Single. Episode. This time, as Rosco accuses them of this or that with his twitchy nose and double-takes, Bo Duke casually reaches under his seat, picks up a stick of dynamite, lights it, and hands it to officer Coltrane. Rosco does his Dup! DyaDya Dup!, and hands the bomb to Enos, who in turn tosses it under their police car.

BOOM!

The Dukes burn rubber outa there and yell YeeeeeeeeHaaa!, leaving Rosco to say Dup! DyaDya Dup! Enos! in a cloud of dust. Foiled again, those modern day keystone cops of the country. But it hit me: To so nonchalantly solve your problems with the police by handing them a live stick of dynamite, is...well, it's hilarious.

Then there's the follow-up action, the plot culmination (if you will.) The story involved some sort of a cabal of black market record makers, or some weird backwoods shit like that. It didn't really matter in the end, because minutes later Bo and Luke were in the same room as Rosco and Enos and the dynamite incident wasn't even brought up, let alone cause to put them in jail for attempted murder, aggravated assault, destruction of police property, etc. Rosco was too busy barking about the temporary antagonists of the story and their twisted plot, which was foiled by a Winnebago full of screaming girls wearing those 1980 rounded shorts with the stripes up the side. I guess they made all the bad guys sexually curious so they'd come out of hiding. They fell for it, mumbling, and were quickly busted by the FBI, who timed their arrival in their blue sedan just perfectly. Without context it was good and confusing, which is the best way to serve the Dukes. None of it mattered anyway. Every Dukes episode was about the YeeeeeeeeeHA! and the cloud of dust and the Boss Hogg gluttony/avarice thing and the Dup! DyaDya Dup! Enos!

Oh, the chuckling. A shake-the-bed, 5-minute chuckle. In the end, the narrator reveals that this whole deal was about fifty bucks that Daisy had lost. I couldn't keep my stomach still. There was the FBI, in the middle of Booneville, chasing down a bunch of criminal dolts, unwittingly receiving the unintended help of the Dukes, who had their own agenda...which I suppose was to get Daisy her fifty bucks back. And blow up a police car.

But that's not all. While the FBI is cuffing the bad guys and the Hazzard sheriffs are doing their end-of-episode bumbling and the Winnebago chicks are yammering, Bo Duke pulls a compound bow from his car, lights a stick of dynamite taped to an arrow, and fires it at a nearby barn.

BOOM!

Why? To close out the show with a gratuitous explosion, of course. He even fired two of them. He blew up the blown up barn. It was brilliant. Now I remember why I had a General Lee and a Bo Duke action figure.

* * * * * * * * *