Please. Ginormous?
So, Merriam-Webster recently announced that they've included ginormous in the latest edition of their dictionary. Great. What's next, hugantic? Dupid? Stumb?
Obviously merging gigantic and enormous, ginormous adds nothing to the language. What's the purpose of a broadened vocabulary, anyway? Precision in communication. If you only have 50 words, you have a dull instrument. I don't have a problem with the idea of making neologisms "official" as long as they sharpen the instrument of language; if they add something to the palette by labeling a new object or concept, or describing an existing object or concept in a unique way.
Ginormous does neither. Who needs it when we already have gigantic and enormous, which are mutually exchangeable? So where are we headed? Will all our slang words eventually graduate to the official list? Probably. As the older, conservative officials in the dictionary business retire or take the Long Nap, the next generations of approvers will stare down their reading glasses at "words" like fugly, bugly, and frenemy. Except they won't have reading glasses because they'll have been lasiked.
They also decided to add "speed dating" to the approved list, but "speed dating" isn't a word, it's a phrase, and even as a phrase it has no business being recognized as a unit of speech. Not when we have speed, and dating. So what's next, Merriam-Webster? "fast car"? Here's one you can add to your list: WTF?
Labels: annoyed